강제의사결정 매트릭스를 활용한 해군 무기체계 효과요소 표준(안) 연구

김건¹^{, *} ; 김성우² ; 조윤철³

1해군(임) 소령/해군 전력분석시험평가단 수중전력소요분석담당
2해군 중령/해군 전력분석시험평가단 소요분석과장
3해군 대령/해군 전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처장

Study on the Standard Effective Factors of Naval Weapons Systems Using Forced Decision Matrix Method

Geon Kim¹^{, *} ; Sung-Woo Kim² ; Yun-Cheol Jo³

1LTCR/Underwater warfare capability requirements analyst, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy
2CDR/Chief of Requirements Analysis Division, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy
3CAPT/Chief of Systems Analysis Division, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy

Correspondence to: ^*Geon Kim E-mail: kinkun12@gmail.com

초록

우리군은 소요기획단계에서 의사결정을 위하여 다양한 기법을 활용한 과학적 분석·평가를 실시하며, AHP 기법은 여러 분야에서 활용되는 대표적인 기법 중 하나다. 하지만 AHP 기법의 효과 요소는 결과에 영향을 끼치는 중요 요인임에도 불구하고 연구자의 주관적인 견해가 반영될 가능성으로 인해 결과에 대한 객관성 확보 측면에서 한계가 있다. 이에 따라 우선 AHP 기법을 적용한 기존 연구 및 분석 사례를 비교해 효과요소를 계층별로 재분류한 후 강제의사결정 매트릭스 기법을 활용하여 각 무기체계별 효과요소 표준 (안)을 제시한다.

Abstract

ROK Military conducts scientific analysis and evaluation using various methods for decision-making at the required planning stage, and the AHP is one of the representative analysis and evaluation methods that are being actively used in the various field. However, although the effect factor of the AHP is an important factor influencing the result, there is a limit to securing the reliability of the result due to the possibility of reflecting the subjective opinion of the researcher. Accordingly, first, by comparing existing research and analysis cases applying the AHP, the effect factor is reclassified by layer, and then a standard effective factors for each weapon system is presented using the forced decision matrix method.

Keywords:

Forced Decision Matrix Method, Weapons Systems, Effective Factors, Standard

키워드:

강제의사결정 매트릭스, 무기체계, 효과요소, 표준

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2023년도 한국해군과학기술학회 동계학술대회 발표 이후 개선 및 발전시킨 논문임

References

Hochan Lee, Taeho Kim, Taeho Kang, Jinseon Park, Tae Woong Park, The Methodology of Effectiveness Analysis Combining M&S and AHP to Improve A Reliability in Decision-Making Process on A Weapon Systems Acquisition: A Case Study of APS System for Tank, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society Vol 24, No. 3, pp. 137-149, 2023. [https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2023.24.3.137]
Saaty, T. L., Decision Making for Leaders; The Analytic Hierarchy Process Decisions in an Complex World, RWS Publications, 1982.
Jangbum Lee, Byeongjo Kim, An Evidence-based Assessment of Policy Decision Tools : A Close Look of AHP, Delphi, and CBA, Korean Society and Administrative Research Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 29-62, 2023. [https://doi.org/10.53865/KSPA.2023.5.34.1.29]
Pil-hoon Jang, Hagyo Jeng, A Study on the AHP Hierarchy Extend for Source Selection of Weapons Systems, KIIE/KORMS Spring Joint Conference, pp. 1592-1600, 2012.
Gokarn, P. R., Essentials of Material Management, Somaiya Publications Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, 1970.
Byungki Jung, Kitae Kim, Sungje Park, Analysis on the Mission Performance of Korean-type Aircraft Carrier Considering Jointness, Journal of the KNST, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 155-160, 2022. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2022.09.5.2.155]