
철도차량 수명주기비용 모델 비교를 통한 함정 총수명주기관리 개선 방안 연구
Ⓒ 2025 Korea Society for Naval Science & Technology
초록
본 연구는 철도차량의 수명주기비용(LCC) 관리 체계를 벤치마킹하여 함정 총수명주기관리의 개선 방향을 도출한다. 기준, 관리 주체, 데이터, 분석 기법, 검증의 다섯 축을 비교한 결과, 철도는 거버넌스 일원화·데이터 표준화·정량 분석·독립 검증이 체계화된 반면, 함정은 정례 LCC 갱신과 표준화가 미흡하고 내부 검증 중심 경향이 뚜렷했다. 이에 관리 체계 일원화, 데이터 표준화 및 정합성 제고, 불확실성·민감도 분석의 상시화, 독립 검증 도입을 제안한다.
Abstract
This study derives directions to improve total life cycle system management (TLCSM) for naval ships by benchmarking the life-cycle cost (LCC) management framework used for railway vehicles. A five-axis comparison—basis, governance, data, analytical methods, and verification—shows that railways feature unified governance, standardized data, quantitative (uncertainty/sensitivity) analyses, and independent verification. By contrast, naval programs lack standardized, periodic LCC updates and rely heavily on internal verification. We recommend unifying the management framework, strengthening data standardization and consistency, institutionalizing uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, and introducing independent verification.
Keywords:
Total Life Cycle System Management, Life-Cycle Cost, Naval Ships, Railway Vehicles, Data Standardization키워드:
총수명주기관리, 수명주기비용, 함정, 철도차량, 데이터 표준화References
- Ministry of National Defense, “Defense Articles Management Act,” 2021.
-
Martin, B., Yardley, R. J., Pardue, P., Tannehill, B., Westerman, E., and Duke, J., “An Approach to Life-cycle Management of Shipboard Equipment,” RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2018, RR-2510-NAVY.
[https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2510]
- Yang, S. C., “Overseas Development Directions of Weapon-system Total Life-cycle Management Policy: Focusing on Organization and Institutions,” Maritime Security Studies & Fusion, No. 199, 2023, pp. 1-29.
- Ministry of National Defense, “Defense Force Development Directive,” 2025.
- Ministry of National Defense, “Directive on Total Life-cycle Management (TLCM)–Related Affairs,” 2023.
- Defense Acquisition Program Administration, “Regulation on Life-cycle Management in the Acquisition Phase,” 2022.
- Republic of Korea Navy Headquarters, “Naval Regulation on Total Life-cycle Management,” 2022.
- Lee, J. H., and Seo, J. H., “Prospects for a Logistics-innovation Organization to Implement TLCSM,” KIDA Brief, 2022.
- Kim, S. H., “A Reliability-based LCC Analysis Method for Railway Vehicles,” Proceedings of the 2016 KSR Spring Conference, 2016, pp. 803-808.
- Maulana, A. A., and Suweca, I. W., “A Review of RAMS Analysis Application on Railway System,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2023, pp. 57-77.
- Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. W., and Mun, S. I., “A Study on the Need to Apply MTTF-based LCC to Improve the Operational Efficiency of Railway Vehicles,” Journal of Mechanical Diagnosis Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2025, pp. 52-62.
- Oh, S. H., and Lee, J. W., “LCC Analysis of Railway Power SCADA System,” Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 27, No. 7, 2024, pp. 605-613.
- Hyundai Rotem, “LAP (LCC Analysis Program) for Railway Vehicles,” Online article, Aug. 31, 2023. Available: https://tech.hyundai-rotem.com/hyundai-rotem-lcc-analysis-program-lap-that-can-efficiently-analyze-the-life-cycle-costs-of-trains/, (Accessed Sept. 23, 2025).
- Jeong, C.-M., and Lee, J.-W., “A Study on Simplification of LCC Estimation Through Correlation Estimation Between Cost Elements for Railway Catenary System,” The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol. 73, No. 5, 2024, pp. 900-905.
- Yeom, S.-K., “A Study on Improvement of Korean Defense Specification Classification System through the Domestic and Foreign Standard Classification System Research and Analysis,” Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 457–465, 2021.