해병대 안전문화와 위험성평가 실행이 안전행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 PROCESS Macro와 FGI를 활용한 혼합연구

임, 성윤¹ ; 이, 창덕² ; 김, 홍석² ; 손, 지영² ; 장, 관수³ ; 박, 교식⁴^{, *}

1해병 중령/숭실대학교 일반대학원 안전보건융합공학과 박사과정
2숭실대학교 일반대학원 안전보건융합공학과 박사과정
3숭실대학교 일반대학원 안전보건융합공학과 박사
4숭실대학교 일반대학원 안전보건융합공학과 교수

Impact of Marine Corps Safety Culture and Risk Assessment Execution on Safety Behavior by Applying a Mixed-Methods Study Using PROCESS Macro and FGI

Sungyun Lim¹ ; Changdeok Lee² ; Hongseok Kim² ; Jiyoung Son² ; Kwansu Jang³ ; Kyoshik Park⁴^{, *}

1Lt. Col., ROK Marine Corps/Doctoral student, Dept. of Safety & Health Convergence Engineering, Soongsil University
2Doctoral student, Dept. of Safety & Health Convergence Engineering, Soongsil University
3Ph.D., Dept. of Safety & Health Convergence Engineering, Soongsil University
4Professor, Dept. of Safety & Health Convergence Engineering, Soongsil University

Correspondence to: ^*Kyoshik Park 369, Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06978, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2-828-7432 E-mail: safetyguy@ssu.ac.kr

초록

본 연구는 고신뢰조직(HRO)인 해병대 안전문화가 위험성평가의 실행을 통해 안전행동에 미치는 경로를 실증적으로 분석하였다. 해병대 장병 203명의 데이터를 분석한 결과, 안전 의사소통이 위험성평가의 실행을 완전매개하여 순응도를 높인 반면 리더십의 직접 효과는 유의하게 나타나지 않았다. 이는 ‘설계된 안전(WAI)’과 ‘실재적 안전(WAD)’ 사이의 괴리 해소가 핵심 과제임을 보여준다. 따라서 현장 중심의 시스템 전환과 비처벌 보고 문화(just culture) 정착을 위한 실천적인 정책적 방향을 제시한다.

Abstract

This research empirically investigated the structural pathways through which the safety culture of the ROKMC, as a high reliability organization (HRO), influences behavior through risk assessment execution. An analysis of 203 personnel suggests that “safety communication” enhances compliance via the full mediation of “risk assessment execution,” whereas the direct impact of leadership was statistically non-significant. These findings underscore that bridging the disparity between “work-as-imagined” (WAI) and “work-as-done” (WAD) is a critical priority. Accordingly, this paper proposes a transition to field-oriented systems and the institutionalization of a “just culture” to provide practical policy directions.

Keywords:

Marine Corps, Safety Culture, Risk Assessment, Safety Behavior, Mediating Effect, WAI and Wad

키워드:

해병대, 안전문화, 위험성평가, 안전행동, 매개효과, 설계된 안전과 실재적 안전

References

Y. H. Kim, ‘A Study on the Development of Risk Assessment System for Preventing Military Safety Accidents,’ Journal of National Defense Policy, VOL. 38, NO. 2, 2022, pp. 99-124.
M. H. Ahn, ‘A Study on the Development Direction of the Army Risk Assessment System Based on ISO Standards,’ Master’s Thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2021.
S. Y. Baek, ‘A Study on the Impact of Trainee Commanders' Safety Leadership on Safety Culture and Behavior,’ Master’s Thesis, Kyung Hee University, 2025.
John W. Creswell & J. David Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, SAGE Publications, 2017.
Mark A. Griffin & Andrew Neal, ‘Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation,’ Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, VOL. 5, No. 3, 2000, pp. 347-358. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347]
Andrew F. Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Guilford Press, 2013.
Erik Hollnagel, Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management, Ashgate Publishing, 2014.
Mary R. Lynn, ‘Determination and Quantification of Content Validity,’ Nursing Research, VOL. 35, NO. 6, 1986, pp. 382-386. [https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017]
Kristopher J. Preacher & Andrew F. Hayes, ‘Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect effects in Multiple Mediator Models,’ Behavior Research Methods, VOL. 40, NO. 3, 2008, pp. 879-891. [https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879]
J. T. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate Publishing, 1997.
Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
Dov Zohar, ‘Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical and Applied Implications,’ Journal of Applied Psychology, VOL. 65, NO. 1, 1980, pp. 96-102. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96]