계층분석법을 이용한 기뢰전 전투체계의 기뢰대항작전 효과 분석

임요준¹ ; 김기태²^{, *}

1국립한국해양대학교 해양무인기술교육센터 부센터장
2해군 중령/합동참모본부 분석실험실 제2전력분석과 해상/공중전력운영분석담당

An Analysis on the Mine Counter Measure Operations Effectiveness of the Mine Warfare Combat System Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Yojoon Lim¹ ; Kitae Kim²^{, *}

1Deputy center director/Maritime Unmanned Technology Education Center, Korea Maritime & Ocean University
2CDR, ROK Navy/Maritime/airborne forces operations researcher, 2nd Military Forces Analysis Division, Joint Analysis and Experiment Center, ROK Joint Chiefs of Staff

Correspondence to: *Kitae Kim E-mail: navystar52@naver.com

초록

해군은 기뢰전 전투체계를 개발하여 차기 기뢰탐색소해함(MSH-Ⅱ)에 탑재할 예정이다. 기뢰전 전투체계는 음탐기 등 약 20여 종의 탑재 장비를 통합·운용하며, 기뢰 탐색, 식별, 제거 등 기뢰탐색소해함의 기뢰대항작전을 효과적으로 지원한다. 본 연구에서는 계층분석법을 이용하여 기뢰전 전투체계의 기뢰대항작전 효과를 분석하였다. 기뢰전 전투체계 작전 효과를 측정하기 위하여 계층구조를 작성하고, 쌍대비교법 기반의 전문가 설문을 통해 16개 속성에 대한 가중치를 산출하였다. 능동적 기뢰대항작전-기뢰탐색-기뢰처리 효과요소의 가중치가 가장 높게 산출되었으며, 기뢰전 전투체계의 기뢰대항작전 효과지수는 현재 대비 약 1.45배 우수한 것으로 확인되었다.

Abstract

ROK Navy plans to develop the mine warfare combat system and install it on the next-generation Mine Sweeper and Hunter(MSH-Ⅱ). The mine warfare combat system integrates and operates approximately 20 types of equipment, including SONAR, and effectively supports the mine counter measure operations of MSH-Ⅱ, such as mine detection, identification, and disposal. In this study, the mine counter measure operations effectiveness of the mine warfare combat system was analyzed using Analytic Hierarchy Process. A hierarchical structure for measuring the mine counter measure operations effectiveness of the mine warfare combat system was developed, and weights of 16 attributes were calculated by expert surveys and pair-wise comparisons. The weight of active mine counter measure - mine hunting - mine disposal was calculated to be the highest. The mine counter measure operations effectiveness of the mine warfare combat system was confirmed to be approximately 1.45 times better than the current one.

Keywords:

Mine Warfare, Combat System, Mine Counter Measure, Analytic Hierarchy Process

키워드:

기뢰전, 전투체계, 기뢰대항작전, 계층분석법

Acknowledgments

본 연구는 한화시스템의 ‘기뢰전 전투체계 연구개발사업’ 지원을 받아 수행한 연구결과이다.

References

K. H. Cho, ‘A Study on the Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness for the New Generation Multiple Launcher Rocket System Using AHP & Parametric Estimating,’ Journal of the KIMST, VOL. 13, NO. 1, 2010, pp. 84-90.
Command ROK Fleet, MHC/MSH Operational Guidelines, 2011.
Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Developing the Brain of the MSH with Domestic Technolodgy [Press Release], 2024.11.25.
Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Launch of Basic Design for MSH-Ⅱ [Press Release], 2023.01.13.
Jolene Marshall, Eric R. LeMay, Joshua Tapp, Alfred T. Diotte, Daniel Quigley, John Givens, Kenneth Reszka, Curt Williams, & Mark Bonnett, An Analysis of the Open Architecture Warfare System Domain Model for Surface Time Critical Targets, Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2007.
Whan-Sik Jung, Jae-Yeong Lee, & Yong-Heup Kim, ‘An Assessment of Combat Effectiveness for C4I System Considering Network Effect,’ Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, VOL. 33, NO. 2, 2010, pp. 23-32.
S. C. Kang, ‘A Study on the Analysis of Combat Effectiveness of the Ground Tactical C4I Systems Using AHP,’ Master’s thesis, Korea National Defense University, 2001.
K. T. Kim & G. W. Jeon, ‘Efficiency Evaluation for Battleships by Using AHP & DEA Model,’ Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, VOL. 1, NO. 2, 2007, pp. 68-91.
Kitae Kim & Yojoon Lim, ‘A Study on the Measuring of Combat Effectiveness for Naval Frigates Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,’ Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, VOL. 44, NO. 1, 2021, pp. 9-16. [https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2021.44.1.009]
Jaemoon Lee, C. Y. Jeong, & Jaeyeong Lee, ‘The Combat Effectiveness Analysis of Attack Helicopter Using Simulation and AHP,’ Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, VOL. 19, NO. 3, 2010, pp. 63-70.
Jonu Lee & Kitae Kim, ‘A Study on the Measuring of Performance Improvement Effectiveness for Submarine Tactical Training Equipment Using AHP,’ Journal of KNST, VOL. 5, NO. 1, 2022, pp. 84-91. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2022.03.5.1.84]
M. H. Lee, H. K. Moon, & C. W. Park, ‘Development of Defense Simulation Model for Ground Weapon System Effectiveness Analysis,’ in proceedings of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2002, pp. 131-136.
S. Y. Lee & J. Y. Lee, ‘A Study on the Assessment of Force Improvement Effectiveness of KNTDS,’ Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, VOL. 27, NO. 2, 2001, pp. 56-75.
S. K. Park & J. Y. Lee, ‘A Study on the Assessment of Power Improvement Effectiveness of Corps Level C4I System Applied to Integrated Fire Operation,’ Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 2003, pp. 8-27.
ROK Navy Flotilla 5, Sea Mine Story, 2015.
ROK Navy Headquarters, Mine Counter Measure Operations, 2024.
ROK Navy Headquarters, MSH Operations, 2022.
ROK Navy Mine Squadron 52, Useful and Mysterious Story About Mine Warfare, 2025.
Thomas L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders; The Analytic Hierarchy Process Decisions in an Complex World, RWS Publications, 1982.
Young-il Song, ‘A Study on the Effectiveness Measures of Ship Combat Systems in the Composite Warfare,’ Journal of National Defense Studies, VOL. 53, NO. 1, 2010, pp. 163-192.
Y. I. Song & G. L. Lee, ‘A Study on the Improvement Effectiveness of Ship Combat System by Using the Simulation Model,’ Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, VOL. 3, NO. 1, 2009, pp. 74-93.