
유·무인복합전투체계 총수명주기관리 적용 방안 연구: SUCA, MUCCA 중심으로
Ⓒ 2026 Korea Society for Naval Science & Technology
초록
본 연구는 유·무인복합전투체계의 안정적 운용을 위해 다중 슬롯 정비 개념 기반의 총수명주기관리 적용방안을 제시한다. 연구 결과, 제한적 재사용·소모성을 갖는 전투기협업무인항공기에는 2단계 정비체계, 저장 신뢰성 관리, 반복 획득 기반의 순환형 운영유지가 적합한 것으로 분석되었다. 반면 반복 운용과 회수를 전제로 하는 전투기협업무인전투기에는 성과기반군수지원과 운용·예비·저장 상태를 순환하는 동적 자산관리체계가 요구된다. 본 연구는 두 공중 무인비행체의 운용특성에 맞는 차별적 총수명주기관리 방향을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.
Abstract
In this study, we propose an application approach for Total Life Cycle System Management (TLCSM) based on the multi-slot maintenance concept to support the stable operation of manned-unmanned teaming. The results indicate that a circular sustainment structure based on a two-level maintenance system, storage reliability management, and recurring acquisition is suitable for small unmanned collaborative aircraft, which is characterized by limited reusability and expendable operation. In contrast, medium unmanned collaborative combat aircraft, which is based on repeated operation and recovery, requires performance-based logistics and a dynamic asset management system that circulates among operational, reserve, and storage states. This study is meaningful in that it presents a differentiated TLCSM direction reflecting the operational characteristics of the two systems.
Keywords:
MUM-T, SUCA, MUCCA, Two-Level Maintenance키워드:
유·무인복합전투체계, 전투기협업다목적무인항공기, 전투기협업무인전투기, 2단계 정비체계Acknowledgments
본 연구는 2025~2026년 공군본부의 지원으로 수행된 「공중 무인체계 총수명주기관리방안 연구」의 연구성과 일부를 포함하고 있다. 또한 연구과정에서 한남대학교로부터 학술적 지원을 받았다. 본 연구가 원활히 수행될 수 있도록 지원해 준 공군본부와 한남대학교에 깊이 감사드린다.
References
-
Simon Schwerd & Axel Schulte, ‘Operator State Estimation to Enable Adaptive Assistance in Manned-Unmanned-Teaming,’ Cognitive Systems Research, VOL. 67, 2021, pp. 73-83.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.01.002]
- Federal Aviation Administration, Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25C), U.S. Department of Transportation, 2023, pp. 21-215.
- International Civil Aviation Organization, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Montréal, Canada: ICAO, ICAO Circular 328 AN/190, 2011.
-
Byung Woon Kim & Ga Eun Choi, ‘Level and Program Analytics of MUM-T System,’ International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, VOL. 25, 2024, pp. 593-604.
[https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00675-4]
- 유용원 의원실, 국방 무인체계 현재와 미래: 육해공 무인체계 발전 방향 세미나, 국회 의원회관 제1소회의실, 2024.
- 우주항공청·한국항공우주연구원, K-드론 기체 공급망 이니셔티브 정책 간담회, KW컨벤션 아이리스홀, 2025.
- 김동현, ‘“미래 KF-21은 자폭·전투 무인기와 편대”···KAI의 유무인 복합戰 복안은 [김동현의 K웨폰],’ 한국경제신문, 2024.07.29.
- 오경원·정진은·김명훈·조환정·김동호, 공중 무인체계 총수명주기관리방안 연구, 공군본부, 2026.
- Mark Gunzinger & Lukas Autenried, Understanding the Promise of Skyborg and Low-Cost Attritable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2020.
- Mark A. Gunzinger, Lawrence A. Stutzriem, & Bill Sweetman, The Need for Collaborative Combat Aircraft for Disruptive Air Warfare, The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2024.
- GBP Aerospace & Defence, KAI Presents Advanced Concepts for Future Air Combat Collaboration, 2025.11.10. https://gbp.com.sg/stories/kai-presents-advanced-concepts-for-future-air-combat-collaboration/, (accessed 2026.05.10.)
-
Luiz Giacomossi, Stiven Schwanz Dias, José Fernando Brancalion, Marcos R. O. A. Maximo, ‘Cooperative and Decentralized Decision-Making for Loyal Wingman UAVs,’ in proceedings of 2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2021 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2021 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), Natal, Brazil, October 2021.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE54079.2021.9605468]
- Gregory C. Allen & Isaac Goldston, The Department of Defense’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft Program, CSIS, 2024.
- Travis Sharp, No Dominant Strategy for Air Dominance, CSBA, 2025.
-
John Colombi, Bryan Bentz, Ryan Recker, Brandon Lucas, & Jason Freels, ‘Attritable Design Trades: Reliability and Cost Implications for Unmanned Aircraft,’ in proceedings of 2017 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), Montreal, Canada, April 2017.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934767]
- U.S. Department of War, Acquisition Transformation Strategy: Rebuilding the Arsenal of Freedom, 2025.
- U.S. Department of Defense, Operation of the Software Acquisition Pathway, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, DoDI 5000.87, 2020.
- U.S. Department of Defense, Digital Engineering, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, DoDI 5000.97, 2023.
- U.S. Department of Defense, DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Activities & Tools Guidebook, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, 2025.
- Monohakobi Technology Institute, The Benefits and Opportunities of Data-Driven Condition Based Maintenance, Lloyd’s Register Group, 2024.
- United States General Accounting Office, Air Force Maintenance: Two Level Maintenance Program Assessment, GAO/NSIAD-96-86, 1996.
- David Wilson, ‘The Anatomy of Two-Level Maintenace in Multi-Domain Battle,’ Army Sustainment, January-February 2018, pp. 32-35.
- U.S. Department of Defense, PBL Guidebook: A Guide to Developing Performance-Based Arrangements, 2016.
-
D. Hurst, Performance-Based Logistics: A Bridge Between Acquisition Reform and Logistics Supply Chain Management, U.S. Army War College, 2006.
[https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA449332]
- Jin Eun Jeong, ‘Performance Measurements and Implementation Strategies for PBL,’ Master’s thesis, Hanyang University, 2009.
- Ingvild Bode & Tom F. A. Watts, Loitering Munitions and Unpredictability: Autonomy in Weapon Systems and Challenges to Human Control, Center for War Studies, 2023.
- Department of the Army, Redesigning Sustainment Organizations Through Transformation in Contact 2.0, Army Sustainment, Summer 2025.