QFD와 FMEA 기반 한국군 전술데이터링크 통합 처리기(DLP) 획득 대안 평가 및 진화적 로드맵 연구

정승훈¹^{, *} ; 신지한² ; 박재수¹

1한화시스템 통신연구소 수석연구원
2한화시스템 해양연구소 수석연구원

Acquisition Alternative Evaluation and Evolutionary Roadmap for an ROK Integrated Tactical Data Link Processor Using QFD and FMEA

Seunghoon Jung¹^{, *} ; Jihan Shin² ; Jaesoo Park¹

1Chief engineer, Communication Research Institute, Hanwha Systems
2Chief engineer, Naval Research Institute, Hanwha Systems

Correspondence to: *Seunghoon Jung E-mail: seunghoon.jung@hanwha.com

초록

본 연구는 한국군 전술데이터링크(TDL) 통합 처리기(DLP) 획득을 위한 3가지 대안을 품질기능전개(QFD)의 품질의 집(HoQ)과 고장유형영향분석(FMEA) 기반 획득 리스크를 융합한 정량적 프레임워크로 비교·평가한다. 작전요구사항 가중치는 공개된 문헌에서 도출하고, 리스크 우선순위는 미 GAO 연례 획득 평가 실적 통계에서 객관적으로 설정하여 재현 가능한 정량 분석을 구현하였다. 검출가능성(D)은 ISO 14971에 따라 독립 변수가 아닌 발생가능성의 완화 수단으로 처리하여 2요소 모델을 채택하였다. 분석 결과 독립 사업화가 HoQ 충족도와 획득 리스크 기준에서 최우위를 차지하였으며, 대형 체계 종속은 일정 지연 리스크가 단일 최고위험 요인으로 확인되었다. 이를 바탕으로 단기, 중기, 장기로 이어지는 3단계 진화적 획득 로드맵을 제안한다.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate three acquisition alternatives for an integrated tactical data link (TDL) processor (DLP) for the ROK military using a quantitative framework that integrates the House of Quality (HoQ) from Quality Function Deployment (QFD) with a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)-based acquisition risk matrix. Operational requirement weights were derived from open official sources. Risk Priority scores were objectively established from U.S. GAO annual acquisition assessment statistics, with detectability (D) excluded per ISO 14971, which defines risk as S×P and treats detection as a probability modifier rather than an independent factor. The results show that independent acquisition achieved the highest HoQ score and the lowest RP, while large-system subordination exhibited the highest schedule-delay risk. Based on these findings, a three-phase evolutionary acquisition roadmap is proposed: short-term, mid-term, and long-term.

Keywords:

Tactical Data Link, Integrated DLP, QFD, FMEA, Defense Acquisition, Acquisition Alternative Evaluation, Evolutionary Roadmap

키워드:

전술데이터링크, 통합 데이터링크처리기, 품질기능전개, 고장유형영향분석, 국방 획득, 획득 대안 평가, 진화적 로드맵

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2026년도 한국해군과학기술학회 하계학술대회 발표 논문임.

References

Seunghoon Jung & Jeongeon Lee, ‘A Study on the Standards Advancement of National Tactical Data Link (TDL),’ Journal of the KNST, VOL. 7, NO. 3, 2024, pp. 378-383. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2024.9.7.3.378]
K. A. Hssain, ‘Analysis of Importance of Tactical Data Link(TDL) in Military Domains in 21st Century,’ Scientific Research Journal(SCIRJ), VOL. XI, NO. VIII, 2023, pp. 70-94.
Juneho Han, Jeongeon Lee, & Seunghoon Jung, ‘A Study on the Development of Interoperability Assessment for the ROK’s Link-22 Operations,’ Journal of the KNST, VOL. 8, NO. 3, 2025, pp. 570-575. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2025.9.8.3.570]
Jeongeon Lee, Juneho Han, & Seunghoon Jung, ‘A Study on the Development of a Verification and Support Device for Link-22 Remote Operation Communication Networks between Land-based and Island Bases,’ Journal of the KNST, VOL. 8, NO. 3, 2025, pp. 510-514. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2025.9.8.3.510]
Michael W. DaBose, ‘Autonomous Agents for Digital Network Maximization,’ Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School 1997.
NILE PMO, Customer Information Guide(CIG), LINK 22 Officical Website, 2020.11.03. https://www.link22.org/uploads/7/9/3/2/7932022/20201001_nile_cig_v2.3.pdf, (accessed 2026.07.22.)
Cheol Hoe Kim & Young Ryeol Kim, ‘A Study on the Development of the ROK Forces’ TDL Through Analysis of the M-TDL Management Case of the Country’s Major Forces,’ Journal of the Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies, VOL. 21, NO. 2, 2014, pp. 224-248.
Juli Ballesteros, ‘U.S. Navy SPAWAR Selects Northrop Grumman to Provide Tactical Data Link System Development and Support,’ GlobeNewswire, 2003.07.23. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2003/07/23/298933/189/en/u-s-navy-spawar-selects-northrop-grumman-to-provide-tactical-data-link-system-development-and-support.html, (accessed 2026.07. 22.)
Juan Romero & Daniel Alan LaVarier, System and Method for Ruggedized Remote Communication, U.S. Patent Application Publication, NO. US 2019/0094911 A1, 2019.03.28. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190094911A1/en, (accessed 2026.07.23.)
John R. Hauser & Don Clausing, ‘The House of Quality,’ Harvard Business Review, VOL. 66, NO. 3, 1988, pp. 63-73.
Lai-Kow Chan & Ming-Lu Wu, ‘Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review,’ European Journal of Operational Research, VOL. 143, NO. 3, 2002, pp. 463-497. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9]
Pavel Fomin, Thomas A. Mazzuchi, & Shahram Sarkani, ‘Incorporating Maturity Assessment into Quality Functional Deployment for Improved Decision Support Analysis, Risk Management, and Defense Acquisition,’ in proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 VOL II, (WCECS), San Francisco, CA, 2009.
Lefayet Sultan Lipol & J. Haq, ‘Risk Analysis Method: FMEA/FMECA in the Organizations,’ International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, VOL. 11, NO. 5, 2011, pp. 49-57.
D. M. Ginn, D. V. Jones, H. Rahnejat, & M. Zairi, ‘The 'QFD/FMEA Interface’,’ European Journal of Innovation Management, VOL. 1, NO. 1, 1998, pp. 7-20. [https://doi.org/10.1108/14601069810198448]
B. Almannai, R. Greenough, & J. Kay, ‘A Decision Support Tool Based on QFD and FMEA for the Selection of Manufacturing Automation Technologies,’ Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, VOL. 24, NO. 4, 2008, pp. 501-507. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.002]
Seunghoon Jung, ‘A Study on the Military Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework(K-RMF) to ROK’s Tactical Data Link,’ Journal of the KNST, VOL. 8, NO. 1, 2025, pp. 81-87. [https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2025.3.8.1.81]
국방부, 국방전력발전업무 훈령, 국방부훈령 제3184호, 2026.07.01. https://www.law.go.kr/행정규칙/국방전력발전업무훈령, (accessed 2026.07.23.)
U.S. Department of Defense, DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.02, DoD CIO, 2010.08. https://dowcio.war.gov/DODAF/, (accessed 2026.07.23.)
Thomas A. Carbone & Donald D. Tippett ‘Project Risk Management Using the Project Risk FMEA,’ Engineering Management Journal, VOL. 16, NO. 4, 2004, pp. 28-35. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2004.11415263]
ISO, Medicial Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices, ISO 14971, 2019. https://www.kmedhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/EN-ISO-14971-2019-Application-of-risk-management.pdf, (accessed 2026.07.12.)
U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Acquisitions Annual Assessment: Drive to Deliver Capabilities Faster Increases Importance of Program Knowledge and Consistent Data for Oversight, GAO-20-439, 2020.06. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-439.pdf, (accessed 2026.07.21.)
U.S. Government Accountability Office, Weapon Systems Annual Assessment: DOD Is Not Yet Well-Positioned to Field Systems with Speed, GAO-24-106831, 2024.06. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-24-106831.pdf, (accessed 2026.07.21.)
U.S. Government Accountability Office, Weapon Systems Annual Assessment: Challenges to Fielding Capabilities Faster Persist, GAO-22-105230, 2022.06. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-105230.pdf, (accessed 2026.07.21.)
홍규빈, ‘한화오션, 울산급 호위함 ‘배치-IV’ 1·2번함 건조 본계약,’ 연합뉴스, 2024.12.19. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20241219085900003, (accessed 2026.07.22.)
방위사업청, 제175회 방위사업추진위원회 결과, 보도자료, 2026.02.23. https://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/doc/selectDoc.do?docSeq=58193&menuSeq=3069&bbsSeq=326&currentPageNo=1&recordCountPerPage=10, (accessed 2026.07.21.)