합동성을 고려한 한국형 항공모함의 임무 수행능력 분석

정병기¹ ; 김기태²^{, *} ; 박성제³

1해군중령(진), 해군 전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처 전투함전력소요분석담당
2해군중령, 해군 전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처 소요분석과장
3해군대령, 해군 전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처장

Analysis on the Mission Performance of Korean-type Aircraft Carrier Considering Jointness

Byungki Jung¹ ; Kitae Kim²^{, *} ; Sungje Park³

1CDR(Sel.), Manager of the Combat Ship Requirement Analysis, System Analysis Center, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy
2CDR, Head of the Requirement Analysis,System Analysis Center, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy
3CAPT, Director of System Analysis Center, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy

Correspondence to: ^*Kitae Kim System Analysis Center, Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group, ROK Navy 663, Gyeryongdae-ro, Sindoan-myeon, Gyeryong-si, Chungcheongnam-do 32800, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-42-553-7250 E-mail: navystar52@naver.com

초록

대한민국 해군은 한국형 항공모함 확보를 추진하고 있으며, 명확한 인식에 기반한 공감대 형성을 위해 과학적·체계적 방법을 이용한 정량적 분석이 요구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 강제 의사결정 매트릭스(Forced DMM, forced decision matrix method) 기법을 이용하여 합동성을 고려한 한국형 항공모함의 임무 수행능력(다양성)을 정량적으로 분석하였다. 스텔스 전투기(F-35B)를 탑재한 한국형 항공모함(CVX)이 0.250으로 가장 우수하였으며, 이지스 구축함(DDG), 3,000톤급 잠수함(KSS-III), 스텔스 전투기(F-35A), 탄도미사일(현무-4) 등 다른 전력 대비 1.05~2.50배 우수하였다. 또한, 한국형 항공모함과 이지스 구축함의 임무 수행능력이 높게 산출되었으며, 이는 해군력의 특성이 충분하게 표현된 결과임을 확인하였다.

Abstract

ROK Navy is securing a Korean-type aircraft carrier, and quantitative analysis using scientific·systematic methods is required to form a consensus based on clear recognition. In this study, the mission performance(diversity) of Korean-type aircraft carrier considering jointness was quantitatively analyzed using Forced Decision Matrix Method. The Korean-type aircraft carrier(CVX) equipped with stealth fighters(F-35B) had the best mission performance at 0.250. It was 1.05 - 2.50 times better than other assets such as aegis destroyer(DDG), 3,000-ton class submarine(KSS-III), stealth fighter(F-35A), ballistic missile(Hyeonmu-4). In addition, the mission performance of CVX and DDG was highly calculated, It was confirmed that the characteristics of naval power were sufficiently expressed.

Keywords:

Aircraft Carrier, Mission Performance, Jointness, Forced Decision Matrix Method

키워드:

항공모함, 임무 수행능력, 합동성, 강제 의사결정 매트릭스 기법

References

Gokarn, P. R., Essentials of Material Management, Somaiya Publications Pvt.Ltd., Bombay, 1970.
Jaiswal, N. K., Military Operations Research; Quantitative Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
Jeong, K. W., National Security and Construction of Light Aircraft Carrier; Focusing on Startegic and Operational Aspects, Military Forum, Korea Association of Military Studies, 2021, Vol. 108, pp. 178-201.
Kim, K. T. and Lim, Y. J., A Study on the Measuring of Combat Effectiveness for Naval Frigates using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2021, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 9~16. [https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2021.44.1.009]
Lee, I. H., 5-year Plan for Shipping Reconstruction and Established Ocean Promotion Corporation, Maritime Korea, 2018, Vol. 543, pp. 20-21.
Lee, M.H., Moon, H.K., and Park, C.W., Development of Defense Simulation Model for Ground Weapon System Effectiveness Analysis, Proceedings of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2002, pp. 131-136.
Ministry of Government Legislation, Act on Organization of National Armed Forces, Vol. 10821(3), 2011.
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 5-year Plan for Shipping Reconstruction, 2018.
ROK Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dictionary of Military Terminology in Joint and Combined Operations, 2014.
ROK Navy Headquarters, Light Aircraft Carrier Identified by Q&A, 2021.
ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval doctrine, 2017.
ROK Navy(www.navy.mil.kr, ), Knowing the Light Aircraft Carrier, 2021.
Yoon, S. J., Jointness of ROK Military, The Concept and Development of Joint Operations, Combat Development Studies, 2011, Vol. 18, pp. 1-34.