호주의 동티모르 관여가 한국에 주는 현재적 함의
Ⓒ 2024 Korea Society for Naval Science & Technology
초록
호주는 동티모르 관여에서 오랫동안 유지해오던 정책을 완전히 전환하고, 결정 과정에서 국가적 합의까지 이끌어낸 모습을 보였다. 그 동인은 중견국의 역할이란 관점에서 행위자 간 접점을 모색하고, 국가적 정체성과 위치 딜레마에서 국익과 보편적 가치 실현 사이에서 균형을 찾고자 한 결과이다. 따라서 본 연구 결과는 한국이 인도태평양전략을 본격적으로 실행하려는 현시점에 시사하는 바가 크다고 할 수 있겠다.
Abstract
Australia showed a complete change in its long-standing policy of engagement in East Timor and even achieved national consensus on the decision. The driving force is the result of seeking contact between agencies from the perspective of the role of a middle power and seeking a balance between national interests and the realization of universal values in the dilemma of national identity and location. Therefore, the results of this study can be said to have significant implications at the moment when The ROK is trying to implement its Indo-Pacific strategy in earnest.
Keywords:
Engagement, Dispatch, Structure-Agency, Middle Power, Indo-Pacific strategy, Global Pivotal State키워드:
관여, 파병, 구조-행위자, 중견국, 인도태평양전략, 글로벌 중추국가Acknowledgments
이 논문은 2024년도 한국해군과학기술학회 하계학술대회 발표 논문임.
References
- Capling, Ann, “Twenty Years of Australia’s Engagement with Asia,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2008. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802457344]
- Cha, Taesuh, “The End of Middle Power Diplomacy in the Post-Unipolar Moment?,” International Area Studies Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2023. [https://doi.org/10.18327/jias.2023.10.27.4.263]
- Clinton Fernandes, “The Road to INTERFET: Bringing the Politics Back In,” Security Challenges, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2008.
- Dong-min Shin, “A study of Agency-Level Influence in International Relations: Theory and Practice,” The Journal of International Relations, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2019. [https://doi.org/10.15235/jir.2019.09.22.3.237]
- Griffiths, Martin & Wesley, Michael, “Taking Asia Seriously,” Australia Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140903517684]
- Gorjão, Paulo, “Australia’s Dilemma between Geography and History: How Consolidated is Engagement with Asia?,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 3, 2003. [https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/3.2.179]
- Han-shik Kim, “Emerging Debate on Applying Morality to International Affairs: A Case of the Independence of the East Timore,” Defense Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2004.
- Hugh White, “The road to INTERFET: Reflection on Australian Strategic Decisions Concerning East Timor, Dec. 1998-Sep. 1999,” Security Challenges, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008.
- Jayasuriya, “Building Citizen: Empire, Asia and the Australian Settlement,” Australia Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140903517692]
- Johnson, Carol(eds.), “Taking Asia Seriously,” Australia Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140903517684]
- Moon, Kyounghee, “Australia's Engagement with Asia,” The Korean Journal of Area Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2010.
- Moon, Kyounghee & Lee, Heejin, “A Study on the Australian Labor Party’s Middle Power Diplomacy,” 21st Century Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2012.
- Moreen Dee, “‘Coalition of the Willing’ and Humanitarian intervention: Australia’s Involvement with INTERFET,” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2001. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310108413905]
- Park, Jieun, “Australia’s Involvement with International Force for East Timor,” Master's Degree Thesis, The Graduate School Seoul National University, 2016.
- Paul D. Williams & Alex J. Bellamy, “Understanding Peacekeeping,” Korea National Defense University, 2021.
- Weiss, Thomas, “Rekindling Hope in UN Humanitarian Intervention,” in Walter Clarke & Jeffery Herbst (eds.), “Learning from Somalia,” Westview Press, 1997.
- Yang Seung-Yoon, “A Study on Timor Leste's Politics and International Relationship,” Asian Studies, Vol. 127, No. 2, 2009.
- Yeoul-Soo Kim, “Recolonization and Independence of East Timor,” Korea and World Politics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2003.