Current Issues

Korea Society for Naval Science and Technology - Vol. 7 , No. 1

[Paper List]


[ Article ]
Journal of the KNST - Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9-15
Abbreviation: KNST
ISSN: 2635-4926 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2022
Received 16 Feb 2022 Revised 08 Mar 2022 Accepted 26 Mar 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2022.03.5.1.9
상대적 영향력 분석을 이용한 해군 장교 장기복무 선발제도 개선
김기태¹^{, *} ; 임요준²

1해군 중령/해군전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처 소요분석과장

2강남대학교 교양학부 교수
Improving the Selection of Long-term Service for Naval Officers Using Relative Influence Analysis
Kitae Kim¹^{, *} ; Yojoon Lim²
1CDR, ROK Navy/System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group

2Professor, Division of Liberal Arts, Kangnam University

Correspondence to : ^*Kitae Kim System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group 663, Gyeryongdae-ro, Sindoan-myeon, Gyeryong-si, Chungcheongnam-do 32800, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-42-553-7250 E-mail: navystar52@naver.com
© 2022 Korea Society for Naval Science & Technology

초록

해군은 전력의 증강과 장교를 임용하여 운용하며, 매년 장기복무 장교를 선발한다. 본 연구에서는 현재의 해군 장교 장기복무 선발제도 평가요소별 상대적 영향력 분석을 통해 문제점을 식별하였다. 최근 3년(2018∼2020년)간 203명의 해군 장교 장기복무 선발자료를 대상으로 상대적 영향력을 산출한 결과 교육성적 ― 영어능력 ― 근무평정 ― 상훈 순으로 높게 나타났다. 평가요소별 배점 비율에 부합하는 상대적 영향력이 작용하기 위해서 근무평정, 지휘추천, 체력검정에 관한 배점 상향과 교육성적, 영어능력, 상훈에 대한 배점 하향이 요구되었다. 민감도 분석을 통해 선발기준에 가장 적합한 인재가 선발될 수 있도록 평가요소별 배점을 ±2-5점, ±2-10점으로 조정하는 방안을 제시하였다. 개선방안에 대한 상대적 영향력을 산출한 결과 배점 순위와 상대적 영향력이 점차 유사해짐을 알 수 있었다.

Abstract

ROK Navy has been operating its increased forces and recruiting officers to achieve its missions, and long-term service officers are selected every year. In this study, problems were identified through relative influence analysis of evaluation factors in the long-term service officer selection. As a result of the analysis on selection data for 203 long-term officers over past 3 years (2018-2020), the highest influence was found from education results, and which was followed by English ability, work evaluation, and prize. In order to adjust accordance of the relative influences to score allocation ratio by evaluation factors, higher ratios are required for work evaluation, command recommendation, and physical strength test, whereas lower ratios for education results, English ability, and prize. By conducting sensitive analysis, this study proposes adjustment of the scoring ratios in range of ±2-5 and ±2-10 points. Calculation of the relative influences on the alternative found that ranks by the alternative scoring gradually became similar with the relative influences.


Keywords: Relative Influence Analysis, Descriptive Statistics, Sensitivity Analysis, Decision Making 키워드: 상대적 영향력 분석, 기술통계, 민감도 분석, 의사결정

References


1.	Choi, J. Y., Kim, H. A., and Kim, Y. B., The Impact of Online Review Volume, Rating, and Sentiment Score on Sales; Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Brand Reputation, Journal of Channel and Retailing, 2020, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 1-21.
2.	Cho, J. S., The Influence Analysis of Success or Failure for Test Variable in University Entrance Examinations, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 2011, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 307-315.
3.	Jung, S. K., Republic of Korea! the Era of Aircraft Carrier is Coming, Korea Type Light Aircraft Carrier Seminar, Korea Maritime Security Forum, 2021.
4.	Kang, M. W., Kim, Y. I., An, C. H., and Lee, Y. G., Regression Analysis; Model Development and Diagnosis, Seoul, Korea: Yulgok Publishing Company, 2016.
5.	Kim, K. T. and Lim, Y. J., A Study on the Evaluation of Naval Officer Personnel Data Using DEA, Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society, 2019, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1-12.
6.	Kim, S. C. and Pyo, H. D., A Study on the Development Model and Establishment of KPIs for the Realization of Social Value in Port Authority, Korea Trade Review, 2018, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 193-214.
7.	Lee, S. C. and Uh, S. B., An Exploratory Study on Selection System Development and the Case H Corporation, Korea Management Consulting Review, 2017, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 255-268.
8.	Ministry of Government Legislation, Act on Organization of National Armed Forces, Ver. 10821(3), 2011.
9.	Ministry of National Defense, Defense White Paper, 2020.
*10.*	Nam, Y. G., Kim, K. T., Cho, S. J., and Hong, Y. G., Selection of the Best Naval Vessel and Presentation of the Improvement Target for War Preparations by Using DEA, Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-13.
*11.*	Park. K. W., Analysis of the Effects of University Admission Factors for School of Sports Science and Physical Education and Academic Performance, Doctoral Thesis, Chuncheon, Korea: Gangwon University, 2015.
*12.*	ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval Active Service Regulation(Officer's Service), 2019.
*13.*	ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval Appointment Regulation(Officer's Appointment), 2019.
*14.*	ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval Manpower Regulation(Acquisition Judgment), 2020.
*15.*	Sim, J. G., An Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Entrance Examination and Job Performance of Public Corporations, The Korean Public Administration Review, 2001, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 121-138.
*16.*	Son, B. W., Comparing Analysis Study on NCS-based Selection Case Study, Korea Management Consulting Review, 2016, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 185-201.
*17.*	Woo, Y. J., A Study on the Influence of Public Institution's Publicity and Profitability on Management Performance Evaluation, Master’s Thesis, Seoul, Korea: Ewha Womans University, 2017.